Journal #25

There are many times people wear masks. Everyone has worn a mask at some point in their life, and it could be for any number of reasons. Often, people wear masks to hide things that they do not want others to see. The most common time to wear a mask is when a person is upset and does not want others to see that they are upset. They will cover their true feelings and hide themselves by seeming to be happy when they are really not. Some people are extremely good at hiding their true feelings. Those are people that can seem incredibly happy no matter what. Some people never figure out that those people are not how they seem to be, and most often only the best friends of those people can ever tell that anything is wrong. There are also a number of people that can not hide anything from anyone. Everyone is able to tell that they are upset, and even though they may think that they are deceiving people by putting on a happy face, but many people are able to see through it. They really are not hiding their feelings from anyone, and though everyone can tell, most people will not do anything about it. Sometimes it is very bad that people do not do anything, because those people that are upset could have a psychological disorder that could be fixed if only someone would do something for the person that is upset. I have worn masks before to try to hide my true feelings, and though it always ends up well, I am still very upset at the time. I am a person that is not good at hiding my true feelings, but as I have gotten older I have either gotten mildly better or people just ignore it more and leave me alone. Many things can happen, good or bad, when people wear masks, and it is often hard to stop wearing masks once a person has started.

"The Pit and the Pendulum"

"The Pit and the Pendulum" is a very that has many characteristics of Edgar Allan Poe's works, and it also has many of the characteristics of Dark Romanticism. "The Pit and the Pendulum" is a story about the Spanish Inquisition (Poe). A man was captured and because he did not admit to his guilt, which made the Spaniards automatically assume he was guilty, he was sentenced to death (Poe). He immediately fainted, and when he woke up he was in the prison (Poe). While he was in the prison, he was nearly killed by falling into a well, but luckily he tripped right before he would have walked into it (Poe). Then, his guards gave him drugged food and water so he was knocked unconscious and strapped him to a bed (Poe). He could move his head and his left arm to his elbow, where there was some spiced meat (Poe). A man signifying Father Time was painted on the wall above him, and Father Time held a pendulum of steel that was sharpened at the point and kept swinging lower, trying to kill the man (Poe). The man escaped this as well by rubbing some of the spices of the meat onto his bonds and letting the rats that were everywhere in the prison chew through the bonds (Poe). He stood and the walls quickly started to close in on him (Poe). He had no idea what to do, because the only place he could go was into the well (Poe). He was dropping in at the last second when suddenly the French general of Napoleon's army caught him, saving his life, and proclaimed that Napoleon's army had gotten through the Spanish defenses and the prisoners that were in the prison had been freed (Poe). The story ends rather abruptly there, but it shows many characteristics of Romanticism and Dark Romanticism. "The Pit and the Pendulum" shows the characteristic of Romanticism that explains that people should use intuition and feeling over their thought and reasoning. The man in the story tried to take the measurements of the dungeon room that he was in, but he confused himself while he was trying to reason it out and made the room seem twice as big as it really was. Much of the story just tries to convey some of the emotions of the man, because he feels a number of emotions, and the greatest of all of these was the fear and the terror that were constantly on his mind. He was very imaginative in the way that he escaped all of his bonds, and he had to come up with many different ideas before he found those that worked. He was also very lucky in that he tripped right before he would have fallen into the well, and I'm sure that the Romanticists would view that as against science in some way, again making it Romanticist. Poe's work talks about the importance of the individual and the individual's mind, and how he would not have been able to escape without some sense of self-worth preserving him through all of his hardships endured in the prison. "The Pit and the Pendulum" definitely showed characteristics of Romanticism.

Poe, Edger Allan. “The Pit and the Pendulum” In American Literature. Willhelm, Jeffory, comp. McGraw Hill. Columbus, 2009. Print.

"The Raven" Criticism

"The Raven" is a poem that can be really enjoyable, but can also scare people or make them not want to read Poe anymore because of the themes he uses. "The Raven" can be interpreted a number of ways, and is often a start of controversies between literary critics (Edgar). "The Raven" talks about a man that wishes for his lost love Lenore, and has no way to do anything about it (Poe). Suddenly, a raven knocks on his window and flies in, and perches on a bust of Pallas Athena above the man's door (Poe). It sits there and stares at the man while the man is going crazy thinking about his lost love (Poe). He talks to himself and to the raven, and he thinks that the raven answers him by saying the word "Nevermore" over and over (Poe). The raven saying "Nevermore" made the man think he was crazy, and it also made the man very, very upset about the fact that the raven said he would never see Lenore again, which broke his heart even more than it had already been broken (Poe). He screamed at the raven to get out of his house, but the raven said that it would move "Nevermore", so the raven stayed on the bust of Pallas Athena for the rest of both of their lives (Poe). When "The Raven" was originally published, many of its readers really enjoyed reading it (Edgar). They loved the suspense, horror, and mystery that the poem brought, and they loved that it was such a new style of writing that they could read (Edgar). The literary critics, though, had mixed reviews of the poem (Edgar). They had many issues with some of the things that Edgar Allen Poe had written, and they declared that some of his lines were inconsistent with the others (Edgar). They thought that some of the literary ideas, such as internal rhyme and some of the more technical concerns that they had made the poem ineffective (Edgar). They also thought some of his lines did not make sense, and they thought that some of them should be gotten rid of. Critics also thought that Edgar Allen Poe had stolen some of his ideas for "The Raven" and possibly some of his other works from a number of other authors such as Charles Dickens (Edgar). They claimed that Poe based his poem off of a book that Dickens had written including a talking raven (Edgar). Though it is logical that they could be linked, the styles of writing would be very different and they would not have any relevancy to the other whatsoever. They argued with him and criticized him so much for it, he even wrote another work that explained how he come up with the idea for "The Raven", because he wanted to prove that it was an original work (Edgar). Many people still do not know what to make of "The Raven" and it is still considered a mildly controversial work, but it is still enjoyed by many. It was the beginning of a new genre of writing, and it changed writing all over the world forever.


"Edgar Allan Poe The Raven Criticism." ENotes - Literature Study Guides, Lesson Plans, and More. Web. 21 Nov. 2010. .


Poe, Edgar A. "The Raven : the Poem." Edgar Allan Poe's House of Usher (fan Site). Web. 23 Nov. 2010. .

"The Raven"

Literal Translation:
-Once at midnight while I was weak and thinking about a lot of forgotten lore, I was almost asleep when suddenly I hear rapping that sounded like someone gently knocking on my bedroom door.
-I said to myself, “It is only a visitor knocking on my door and nothing else.”
-I distinctly remember that it was the middle of December and every dying ember could be seen going out.
-I wished for tomorrow to come; I had vainly wished that my books would give me an end to my sorrow-sorrow for the lost Lenore, the beautiful girl the angels call Lenore, nameless here forever.
-And the rustling of the curtains thrilled me and filled me with terrors; so now, to calm my heart, I said to myself “It is only a late visitor who is knocking at my bedroom door and nothing else.”
-My heart grew strong; so I waited no longer, I said “Sir or Madam, please forgive me; but I was napping and you knocked so gently, I was not sure I heard you,” then I opened the door and nothing was there.
-I stood looking into the darkness for a long time, dreaming things no mortal had ever dreamed; but nothing happened, the only wound was my whispered “Lenore!” which was returned by an echo, “Lenore!” and nothing else.
-I turned around and my heart was pounding, soon I heard more knocking.
-“Surely that is something at my window,” I said; “Let me see what it is and explore this mystery, calm down, heart, and let me explore this mystery; it is only the wind.”
-Here I opened my shutter and a Raven from days past stepped in.
-He did not show respect; he did not stop or stay for a minute; but he perched on a bust above my bedroom door, a bust of Athena, just perched and sat and nothing else.
-The black bird twisted me into thinking it smiled, by the stern face it wore, I said “Though your feathers are gone you are not a coward, ghastly, ancient Raven, from the Nightly shore-tell me your lordly name on Pluto’s shore!”
-The Raven said “Nevermore.”
-I marveled at the clear conversation, though its answer had little meaning or relevancy; For we all agree that no human could see a bird above his bedroom door, bird or beast on the sculpture above his door with a name like “Nevermore”.
-But the Raven, sitting on the peaceful bust, said only that one word, as if that was his whole soul.
-He said nothing more and did not move until I said “He will leave tomorrow, like my other dreams.”
-Then it said “Nevermore.”
-Startled that it replied at such a time, I said “Surely this is only what the bird picked up from an unhappy master whom Disaster followed until his songs only talked about Never and Nevermore.”
-But the Raven, still tricking me into thinking he was smiling, I moved a cushioned seat to right in front of the bird, bust, and door; then, sitting down, I forced myself to start figuring out what the bird meant in saying “Nevermore”.
-This I sat pondering, not speaking to the bird who stared me down to my inmost core; I sat figuring out this and more, my head laid back, on the cushion the lamplight went over but that she would touch nevermore.
-Then, the air became more dense, perfumed with a hidden censer swung by Seraphim whose footsteps tinkled on the floor.
-I cried “Wretch! Your God lent you and sent you with these angels, give me respite and nepenthe to keep me from thinking of Lenore, drink this nepenthe and forget Lenore!”
-The Raven said “Nevermore.”
-I said “Prophet! Evil thing! Prophet, whether bird or devil! Whether sent by the devil or here because of storms, alone but not scared, stuck on this desert land, at this house, forever with horror, tell me truly, will I ever be relieved of my suffering? Tell me, I beg you!”
- The Raven said “Nevermore.”
- said “Prophet! Evil thing! Prophet, whether bird or devil! By Heaven above and the God we both adore, tell this sorrowful soul if in the coming Eden, I shall hold a girl the angels call Lenore, hold a beautiful girl the angels call Lenore.”
-The Raven said “Nevermore.”
-I said “Then let that word be the last, bird or devil! Get back into the storm and near Pluto! Leave no feathers signifying your speech! Leave me in my loneliness! Leave the bust above my door!”
-The Raven said “Nevermore.”
-And the Raven, never moving, still sitting there on the peaceful bust of Athena above my bedroom door; who has eyes that seem like a demon is dreaming, with the lamplight that casts your shadow on the floor; My soul shall never be lifted from that shadow floating on the floor.

Edgar Allen Poe uses a great deal of literary devices in his poem "The Raven", and quite a bit of it is symbolism. He repeats things a great deal for either emphasis or so he can paint the image a little bit differently in the mind of the reader. He also uses allusions a lot, leading to other things. He often alludes to the Bible and stories or passages in it. He also symbolizes many different things, because the Raven could symbolize his conscience, his unconcious mind, or things that he knows but refuses to come to terms with.

I think this poem is very dark and has a dark meaning, but it also may hide the true meaning from many of its readers. This poem talks about a man speaking with a Raven, who could symbolize his unconscious mind, and a lost lover that he longs for desperately. I think the man in the poem is imagining the whole thing and in reality is asleep, asking himself if he will ever see his lover again. He wants to hope for the best and get rid of his sorrows, but deep inside, he knows that he will never see his lover again, in this life or in the next, but he wrestles with himself over it. He does not want to believe that his hopes have been dashed, but he subconsciously knows that his hopes are dead. This is a very intriguing poem with many possible meanings and explanations.

Journal #24

There are many times when one's mind plays tricks on them. Often, the mind will play tricks on people when they are afraid of something or are paranoid. People are normally more wary when it is dark out, and that is more often when people see something that is not there. They also can not see everything clearly when it is dark out, and that adds on to their worry. I have been scared many times in the dark after I have seen scary movies or television shows, because I often go to bed right after them, and when I was younger I was afraid of the dark. I would think that the people or animals or beasts in the show that I had just watched would be in my room, so I would be very scared about what was in my room. I would want one of my parents to come and tuck me in, and I would always put my head right under the covers as soon as they left and the light was out. I also did that when I had nightmares, because those always freaked me out a lot. I would always hide completely under the covers with enough room open in my covers to have a breathing passageway. I would also get a stuffed rabbit that I called "Bunny" and I would put him right next to me on the pillow next to me. I always thought that he would protect me from any scary monsters and keep me safe, because when I was younger I thought he was the epitome of goodness, so he could keep any scary monsters that were in my room away. He always made me feel better when he was there, and he consistently helped me get back to sleep at night because I thought he would protect me. There are many times when people can have tricks played on their mind, and it often happens in the dark when people are already scared and wary anyway.

Thoreau's "Walden"

Henry David Thoreau's Walden is a very complex work. Walden describes a time in Thoreau's life where he went to the woods and lived by himself in a shack that he built, for two years, two months, and two days (Thoreau). He was trying to show everyone what it was like to live away from society and be in touch with nature constantly (Thoreau). Walden is a long work, that includes a number of different pieces that he wrote, which are all about different things, even if the topics are similar (Thoreau). He is trying to show his opinions on a number of things, including society, government, and nature, and their effects on people (Life). His book did not sell very well in the beginning, and there could be many reasons for that (Life). Many critics of that time did not really know what to do with the book, or what to think of it, so some were against the book, while others really enjoyed it (Life). Thoreau has been praised for his intelligence and his creativity, while he has also been frowned upon for the complexity of the his work when it was supposed to be about simplicity, and other hypocritical things that he had done while living in the wild and had written in his works (Life). A number of people also only look at a portion of his work, while completely ignoring the other parts, and it is generally based on the topics involved (Life). Some people only pay attention to the parts of Walden that are about the nature and the simplicity of it all and how it will help them check out from society and relax, while others only pay attention to the portions that involve society and government and his opinions on those things, which he did not get rid of while he was out in the wild (Life). Many people have noticed that Thoreau could not stick to one topic, and many people think he was hypocritical in the way that he did things (Life). He did not always stay in his cabin, and he often went to visit his sister and have supper with her. He went into town to get his groceries, so he did not really need to worry about killing things or collecting any food or supplies, so he was not necessarily completely living out by himself. Many people will not read his book or listen to his teachings because of the fact that he did not necessarily completely check out from society like he tries to say in his book (Life). He leaves some misconceptions in there and does not try to correct them, which make many people ignore his work and throw it all away completely. Thoreau made his work Walden stretch out and become incredibly long, so while many people do not like his book at all, it also makes people able to see different ideas about nature, society, and other things that may not be said today (Life). His work and his ideas are very intriguing, while they also are controversial and spark a lot of debate (Life). Thoreau was a good author, but many people do not agree with what he did in writing Walden or how he did it.

"Thoreau's Walden - an Annotated Edition." The Thoreau Reader. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. .

"Life in the Woods Henry David Thoreau Walden; or Criticism." ENotes - Literature Study Guides, Lesson Plans, and More. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. .

Journal #23

I think many people would find it difficult to go a week without any technology. I think it could be easy depending on who I am with. If I am with the people that I am constantly talking to, there would be no need for me to have my phone. I also would not need music or radios or television, because I would have other people to be with and talk to. I would probably do this somewhere in Europe, because I have always wanted to go to Europe. I could backpack the continent, because there are many different countries and places in certain countries that I want to go. It would also be very fun to take a camping trip in Australia, because Australia is a beautiful continent and country, that would have many exotic places for people to enjoy while they have no technology. I would enjoy camping in a number of places in the United States of America as well. I have always wanted to see Yellowstone, so there is a good chance that that would be a fun place to camp. The Grand Canyon is beautiful, but I think I would be more scared to camp there, because I have heard a number of stories of people who have gone in the Grand Canyon and run out of water, become delirious, and died or killed themselves because they did not know what they were doing. If I did go camping in the Grand Canyon, I would make sure to pack an excess of water so I would not need to worry about running out. I would not mind camping in Illinois, because if it was good weather, we have good woods to camp in, and while there are animals, if people are smart, they will be alright and not have to deal with it. I do not think I would like camping in Africa or the Amazon, because I would be too afraid of the animals that are there and what they could do, plus the weather is not always good, but I do not think I would really mind being without technology for a week if I had a few people with me to help me pass the time.

Thoreau and Gandhi

David Thoreau and Mahatma Gandhi were both people that wanted to persuade others to follow their causes, and they did so in different ways. While there are mainly differences, there are some similarities as well, so they are good things to compare and contrast. Thoreau wrote a small essay called "Civil Disobedience" which discussed his issues with the government and the night that he spent in jail because he refused to pay a poll tax (Thoreau). Gandhi gave a speech titled "On the Eve of the Historic Dandi March" which tried to persuade people to follow his point of view on getting rid of the salt issues that his country was having with Britain (Gandhi). They had similarities in their works in different ways. They both were going against their government, but trying to be peaceful about doing so (Thoreau) (Gandhi). They were both standing up to their government, and Thoreau was doing so by not paying a poll tax, while Gandhi was doing so by trying to get his own salt from the oceans instead of needing to buy it from Britain (Thoreau) (Gandhi). They were both against violence and did not want anyone to be hurt by their actions, but they both also wanted their opinions to come out into the open and be known by everyone around. They had more differences than they did similarities, though, and I think that is because they are from different time periods, so they had different styles of writing and speaking. Thoreau wrote his essay more as a story than as a persuasive essay, even though they had some of the same qualities (Thoreau). He was explaining a lot of the details of his time in jail and described many of the little, unimportant things that had been happening around him (Thoreau). He talked about the point that he was trying to make in the very beginning of his essay, but he quickly lost his point in the details (Thoreau). He was more worried about explaining how his night in jail was not terribly hard and how it was even pretty fun and not that difficult for him (Thoreau). He claimed that he might not have even had that hard of a time staying there for quite a long period of time (Thoreau). Gandhi was different in his speech, because was more inspirational to others than Thoreau's essay (Gandhi). Gandhi was trying to motivate other followers that shared his belief (Gandhi). He was trying to tell everyone else that the tax that the British were imposing on them was wrong and that it should be changed (Gandhi). Gandhi was explaining to the other followers that even if he and other people should get arrested while they were protesting the tax, the other people should keep going in their fight so that hopefully they could eventually get the tax lifted so that it will be gone (Gandhi). Thoreau only explained that he protested the United States being involved in wars and slavery, but he did not say that much about how he protested, which was by refusing to pay a poll tax, which seems to have very little relevance (Thoreau). Gandhi and Thoreau both wanted to protest something that their government was doing or was allowing others to do, but they did so in very different ways, and they also documented it very differently.

Thoreau, Henry D. "Civil Disobedience." The Transcendentalists--including Ralph Waldo Emerson--David Henry Thoreau--Others--Dial Magazine. Web. 13 Nov. 2010. http://www.transcendentalists.com/civil_disobedience.htm.

Gandhi. "Famous Speeches of Gandhiji: On the Eve of the Historic Dandi March." Mani Bhavan--Gandhi Sangrahalaya: Mahatma Gandhi Museum & Reference Library. Web. 13 Nov. 2010. http://www.gandhi-manibhavan.org/gandhicomesalive/speech4.htm.

Journal #22

Using some of the Romanticism qualities, there are quite a few instances that it would be okay to break the law. It was important to use intuition, so if one thought that they had a gut feeling that something bad would happen but they could stop it by breaking the law, then it would be their responsibility and duty to break the law, so in the end they would really be helping everyone else. It is also allowable to break the law when one's ethics or morals think the law does not matter or is irrelevant. Robin Hood and his Merry Men would be people that the Romanticists worshiped, because they broke the law, but they gave all of their earnings and everything that they got to the poor and to the people that needed it much more than they did. They stole from rich, wealthy people and killed some of the animals that had been deemed the King's to give that money and the meat of the animals to other people who had lost everything and could barely get enough. In fact, they did not get enough food for everyone, so the families had to eat smaller portions, but Robin Hood and his Merry Men helped by giving those people and those families the meat that they had killed. Robin Hood was an outlaw that everyone who followed the law wanted dead, but all of the poor people that were benefiting from his deeds loved him and wanted him to never leave them. Romanticists had a broad view of the law, and they interpreted it very loosely, which helped them get ahead against everyone else in the long run, but not everyone agreed with them and what they did or stood for. The Romanticists thought that the law was not always relevant, and they thought it appropriate to break the law if it was necessary or if their ethics and morals went against the law and prodded them to go against it to do what they thought was right.

"Emerson and the Work of Melancholia"

"Emerson and the Work of Melancholia" is very descriptive, not only of Emerson's works, but also of his personal life and the tragedies that he went through (Emerson). It speaks of his strggle to try to reach his place of peace (Emerson). He tried to go along with the Romanticists and Transcendentalists for quite a while, but eventually, later in his life, he went completely against everything he had believed in (Emerson). Earlier in his life, he had claimed that mourning and being upset would only hurt a person, and one should not do so. He had many tragedies in his life, though, and so he really needed to put into practice what he had said (Emerson). He actually did a pretty good job in following what he believed, even though it was hard for him. He went through life happy, and he relied on himself for a number of things. In fact, that is what he preached to others (Emerson). He wanted people to be self-reliant and to be able to get for themselves what they needed. He wanted them to figure things by using their intuition and not by using science or reason. He also thought being with nature and relaxing through getting away from society would really help other people. He was very into Romanticism and Trascendentalism early in his life, and he was very extreme in how much it influenced him and how much he tried to influence others by the way that he used them as well (Emerson). Soon, though, the pressures and tragedies of his life got to him, and he started to lose his original thinking and ideas (Emerson). He quickly turned away from everything he had known, and he walked away from Romanticism and Transcendentalism completely (Emerson). He turned in the total opposite direction, and he did things that went against everything he had preached in the early years of his life (Emerson). He mourned and was constantly upset, and he did not worry as much about nature or about relaxing (Emerson). He let everything that had happened to him finally catch up to him, and he mourned greatly over the losses of his young wife, early in their marriage, his brother, pretty soon after his wife died, and his young son, who was five years old when he passed away (Emerson). He realized that sometimes it is very important to mourn and realize the loss of a loved one can still be used for good. He recognized the fact that it is often good to celebrate the people for their lives as they were, not to dwell on the could have's, should have's, or would have's, because that will only make a person more upset than they would have been in the first place. Emerson learned many great lessons over the course of his life, and he realized that often, one must make a mistake or try a number of different things before a person can finally get at least somewhere close to right (Emerson). He learned that experience is very important in life, and so is remembering people as they were, not as what should have happened. Emerson was a great author and poet, even though he switched his style halfway through his life.

"Emerson and the Work of Melancholia." Raritan (Spring 1987). Quoted as "Emerson and the Work of Melancholia" in Bloom, Harold, ed. Ralph Waldo Emerson, Updated Edition, Bloom's Modern Critical Views. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 2006. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On Fild, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?ItemID=WE54&SID=1&iPin=MCVRWE007&SingleRecord=True (accessed November 7, 2010).

Journal #21

Ralph Waldo Emerson and Benjamin Franklin have differing views on self-reliance. Emerson thought that self-reliance was very important. He thought that everyone should rely on oneself. He also believed that each person should tell everyone else about their thoughts and ideas, because he thought that eventually the person's thoughts and ideas would get out anyway, so he figured that the person with the original idea might as well say it. He also thought that if one person did not tell their thoughts or ideas, someone else would, and the person with the original idea would be ashamed, because they had the idea in the first place but they were too cowardly to say anything, so they would be ashamed that they had not said the idea first. Benjamin Franklin had different ideas, because he thought that each person should work together for the greater good of the country or anything else they are involved in. He believed that people should not work for themselves, but that the person should be sacrificial and work toward the good of everyone else, not for themselves. If Benjamin Franklin and Ralph Waldo Emerson had discussions on self-reliance, they would have had very opposing views. They probably would have argued quite a bit, and I am not sure if they would have ever ended up agreeing. They may have just had to agree to disagree, but their views are so different that they would have had a very hard time finding any points to agree on. They probably would have agreed on the fact that people should all try to reach the good of everyone, but at the same time, they probably would have disagreed on how to do it. Franklin and Emerson may have been friends, but they would argue, or "discuss", they differing views and opinions often. Benjamin Franklin and Ralph Waldo Emerson were very different people with very different views, but they were both vital in the history of America and American writing.

Journal #20

It is very necessary to take a break from society sometimes and to relax. It is also important to reflect on oneself and one's actions. One should reflect on one's actions, so if a person made a mistake in the past, they would be able to realize it and possibly fix it in the future. They could realize what the circumstances were, and they could realize what decision they should have made. It is important, though, for them to not be too hard on themselves, because then they would only be thinking about the what ifs or the could haves, should haves, or would haves, and those will only hurt the person instead of helping them. It is important to get away from society sometimes, because that is a good way to release stress. It is important to release stress because that way people will be happier and less angry with each other. People would be nicer to each other and more patient, because they would not be stressed out to begin with, which is putting pressure on them and makes them upset and impatient. Stress is a very bad thing in life, and it is very important to get rid of stress in a good and healthy way. Stress can actually really hurt someone, because it can be a cause of anxiety and can eventually lead to depression, which could lead to suicide if it got bad enough. It is very important to get rid of stress, and getting away from society is a good way to lose stress. It is important to figure out how to get rid of stress in a good way, because that way no one will be harmed when one must get away. People can be very confusing, and stress can be bad, but it is good to get rid of it. Sometimes it is important to be alone and reflect on oneself and the decisions one has made in the past, so one can make better decisions in the future and can better their life.

Journal #19

The ideal United States would have some of the same qualities as the United States does now, but it would also have some different qualities. The ideal United States would still be democratic and allow people to vote for their leaders. There would be a difference in how candidates would run for their positions, though, because instead of spreading bad things about the other candidates on television or online or through any other means of communication, they would only be able to express the principles that they believed in and promote the things that they would do if they were in office. There would have to be an unlimited amount of land, so everyone that wanted to could come to the United States, and they would not have to go through such a rigorous system to try to enter. The people would be able to help decide where their tax money went, so we would not be in debt, and we would be a very prosperous country. We would have a good economy, and be self-sufficient, but we would still trade with other countries so that we could help their economy to make it as good as ours is. We would have politicians that do not lie, are not corrupt, and really speak what the people want to say. They would not just say one side of the story, either, but they would explain both sides of every story and figure out which was really better for the good of the country. They people whose side did not win would not be upset, for they would realize that it was true, and the government would help those that did not benefit from whatever law they had just passed. There would be more people that would be policemen, firemen, and doctors, so everyone could be okay if something bad happened, and everyone would know what to do if there was an emergency. Everyone in the country would be willing to help each other, and people would be a lot kinder to each other in the ideal United States of America.

"My Playmate" Analysis

I chose to analyze the poem "My Playmate", by John Greenleaf Whittier. The literal translation is as follows:
"The pine trees on Ramoth Hill were very dark, and blossoms were falling off the trees because of the May wind.
The blossoms fell at our feet, the birds from the orchard were singing clear, it was the sweetest yet saddest day of the year.
My playmate left her home, but it hurt me more than the animals, and took with her spring, music, and the bloom of flowers.
She kissed her family and acquaintances, and held my hand; what more could I ask, I who had fed her father's cows?
She left in May, years kept passing and May mornings llike the one she left happened, but she never returned.
I walk through the years, and every year I sow in spring and reap the ears of corn in autumn.
She lives where her summer roses blow all year long, and she sees the children of the sun come and go.
Perhaps there she smooths her silken gown with jewelled hands, which is no longer the lap with homespun clothes where I shook the walnuts.
Wild grapes are on the hill and nuts are on the hill, they wait for us, but still the woods of Follymill are made sweet by the May flowers.
Lilies blossom, birds build nests, and the dark pines on Ramoth Hill sing the slow song of the sea.
I wonder if she thinks of the trees and the old times, or if the pines of Ramoth Hill are in her dreams.
I see her face and hear her voice, does she remember mine?
What am I to her now, I that fed her father's cows?
Does she care that orioles build for other eyes than ours, that other hands are filled with nuts or other laps with flowers?
Oh playmate in the good old days!
Our mossy seat is still green, the violets bloom around it, and trees bend over it.
The winds which blow with the scent of birch and fern, also blow memories, and in spring the veeries sing of long ago.
The pines of Ramoth Wood are still moaning like the sea, the sea of change which has come between you and me."

Whittier used a number of poetic devices. He similes, and an example of one is when he says "...The blossoms in the sweet May wind were falling like the snow." He is using the simile "like the snow" to describe the blossoms. He brings up another mental picture of snow falling to show how the petals were falling. He also uses imagery in a number of ways. He paints beautiful pictures with his words. Some examples of this are "The blossoms drifted at our feet, The orchard birds sang clear;..." "The lilies blossom in the pond, the bird builds in the tree,..." "...Our mossy seat is green, Its fringing violets blossom yet, The old trees o'er it lean."

I think this poem is pretty straightforward, and it is talking about his playmate from when he was young. He worked on her father's farm and really looked up to her, and he probably had a crush on her. One day, when she became old enough, she left the farm on a beautiful May day, and she never came back. Whittier assumed that she had done well for herself, so he assumed that she was wearing beautiful clothes and had expensive material items. He still wants her to come back to him and it seems as if she was his first love, and that he spent many years of his life pining for her. The poem never explains, though, what happened to either of them, so the poem just seems very sad.

Journal #18

The dog went to the park so he could play.
He liked to go to the park ev'ry day.
His name was Boxer and he liked to bark,
Wherever he went he left a big mark.
He was an incredibly friendly pup,
He even had a very special cup.
Suddenly one day Boxer ran away,
To hide from everyone so he could lay
Down and give birth to a litter of pups,
And through all of his down and all his ups,
His owners found out that he was a she,
And from all of the things that they could see,
She was just as wonderful as a he,
But they had to go on a shopping spree.
The pups were wonderful to everyone,
But they were not given away, not one.

The End

"Thanatopsis"

The literal analysis of "Thanatopsis" is as follows:

• Nature talks to Nature Lovers and steals their thoughts.


• His last thoughts come like a bad dream over his spirit and make him sad which drives him to go listen to Nature because soon he will die and no one will care he is gone.


• He will be buried and the Earth will use his body for nourishment.


• Oak roots will use him to grow the tree.

• He is not dead yet and he will not die alone.


• He will be with the great and the rulers at a great meeting.


• Nature decorates man's tomb.


• The whole universe is shining on cemeteries.


• There are more dead people than living.


• The dead rule the Earth from within.


• What if you die and no one notices?


• All the living will end up dead.


• Everyone will go one when you are gone, but they will all die in the end.


• Eventually, everyone will be dead with you.

• When you die, go peacefully.

Poetic Devices:

Whitman uses many poetic devices, but he mostly uses similes and leaves the rest up to us to determine. An example of a simile in his poem "Thanatopsis" would be "Like one who wraps the drapery of his couch About him, and lies down to pleasant dreams." Another example would be "...like the quarry-slave at night, Sourged to his dungeon,..."

There are many different things that Whitman could be trying to make us understand in his poem, and he could be saying many different things. I think he is mostly saying that there is a man that will die soon, but Nature has been very kind to him and will sooth him. I also think that he is trying to reassure this person, because he discusses how everyone on the Earth dies and will be dead at some point, so this person has nothing to worry about. He is saying that this person does not need to fight death becasue it will come as a relief, so this person can go peacefully.